COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.1055-1056 [SLACK_001269] · slack_pm:msg:11029

Page text: p.1055, p.1056 · original PDF

Date
2022-01-13 13:25
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Okay, great - I think David (and others) have this as 2/9 - because of this: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-01-13 at1.24.38 PM.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2022-01-13 13:21 Kristian G. Andersen open
    One thing to check on that we need to get right with Quammen too - did we post on Virological on 2/9 or 2/16? I think2/16, no? @Andrew Rambaut
  2. 2022-01-13 13:23 Andrew Rambaut open
    shared file(s): image.png
  3. 2022-01-13 13:24 Andrew Rambaut open
    Need to check if that is the data for the last update.
  4. 2022-01-13 13:25 Kristian G. Andersen
    Okay, great - I think David (and others) have this as 2/9 - because of this: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-01-13 at1.24.38 PM.png]
  5. 2022-01-13 13:25 Kristian G. Andersen open
    The edit history makes it looks as if it's Feb 9 - but it's not, it's Feb 16 (just checked our email chain too)
  6. 2022-01-13 13:26 Andrew Rambaut open
    Yes - you click on the 'Feb '20' to get the full time stamp
  7. 2022-01-13 13:26 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I have it on wayback machine too: https://web.archive.org/web/20200217170645/https://virological.org/t/the-proximal-origin-of-sars-cov-2/398
  8. 2022-01-13 13:27 Andrew Rambaut open
    Yeah - the admin can easily and invisibly change the timestamps on Discourse so it shouldn't be used as hard proof

Full conversation →