Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1053 [SLACK_001267] · slack_pm:msg:11002

Date: 2022-01-13 05:33
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

From Collins: 'Wondering if there is something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy, with what seems to be growing momentum' - again it is the conspiracy they are talking about.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-13 05:21 Andrew Rambaut open

The very start of this document is actually really good description of our position (i.e., notes from the conference call): [shared file(s): image.png]
2022-01-13 05:23 Robert F. Garry open

Yes - important to remember that the scenarios in PO1 were synthesized from whole cloth. That's why PO1 had such an impact and ppl like Alina hate it. It's because it so clearly and cleanly laid out the possibilities.
2022-01-13 05:25 Andrew Rambaut open

It is also important to remember it started as a report to the group that requested our investigation.
2022-01-13 05:30 Andrew Rambaut open

Further - the stuff (from Ron, as it happens, not Tony or Jeremy) that it might harm Chinese science in the snippetbelow - it is the 'accusations' - if not supported by strong data - that he is talking about. [shared file(s): image.png]
2022-01-13 05:33 Andrew Rambaut

From Collins: 'Wondering if there is something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy, with what seems to be growing momentum' - again it is the conspiracy they are talking about.
2022-01-13 05:34 Robert F. Garry open

I have a feeling that the final words have not yet been written about the Origins of Proximal Origins.

Full conversation →