A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
This one is also good - shows we were discussing all of the possibilities: [shared file(s): image.png]
-
Also - there are links to google docs (only in emails between us). So if FOIs were granted would mean these go public. ``` Trying to create a summary of the most important takeaways from the discussions today. Please feel free to edit/slash/comment. Hoping that we could maybe share this with Jeremy and Tony tomorrow (if y'all think it makes sense).https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HOVHVaahY2wMwAij_Mb-rLTV3QomBai-DwRDcn506OE/edit?usp=sharing```
-
I just say this because the complete edit history is in these docs. That may help show that there was not interferencebut need to check how these might be interpreted.
-
The very start of this document is actually really good description of our position (i.e., notes from the conference call): [shared file(s): image.png]
-
2022-01-13 05:23
Robert F. Garry
Yes - important to remember that the scenarios in PO1 were synthesized from whole cloth. That's why PO1 had such an impact and ppl like Alina hate it. It's because it so clearly and cleanly laid out the possibilities.
-
It is also important to remember it started as a report to the group that requested our investigation.
-
Further - the stuff (from Ron, as it happens, not Tony or Jeremy) that it might harm Chinese science in the snippetbelow - it is the 'accusations' - if not supported by strong data - that he is talking about. [shared file(s): image.png]
-
From Collins: 'Wondering if there is something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy, with what seems to be growing momentum' - again it is the conspiracy they are talking about.
-
I have a feeling that the final words have not yet been written about the Origins of Proximal Origins.