Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2022-01-13 05:19 Andrew Rambaut open
   I just say this because the complete edit history is in these docs. That may help show that there was not interferencebut need to check how these might be interpreted.
2. 2022-01-13 05:21 Andrew Rambaut open
   The very start of this document is actually really good description of our position (i.e., notes from the conference call): [shared file(s): image.png]
3. 2022-01-13 05:23 Robert F. Garry open
   Yes - important to remember that the scenarios in PO1 were synthesized from whole cloth. That's why PO1 had such an impact and ppl like Alina hate it. It's because it so clearly and cleanly laid out the possibilities.
4. 2022-01-13 05:25 Andrew Rambaut open
   It is also important to remember it started as a report to the group that requested our investigation.
5. 2022-01-13 05:30 Andrew Rambaut
   Further - the stuff (from Ron, as it happens, not Tony or Jeremy) that it might harm Chinese science in the snippetbelow - it is the 'accusations' - if not supported by strong data - that he is talking about. [shared file(s): image.png]
6. 2022-01-13 05:33 Andrew Rambaut open
   From Collins: 'Wondering if there is something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy, with what seems to be growing momentum' - again it is the conspiracy they are talking about.
7. 2022-01-13 05:34 Robert F. Garry open
   I have a feeling that the final words have not yet been written about the Origins of Proximal Origins.

Full conversation →