COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1021 [SLACK_001235] · slack_pm:msg:10662

Page text: p.1021 · original PDF

Date
2021-10-13 14:12
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I suggest you both just say "no" to Jeremy - or have the lawyers say "no". He/they will then have to figure out what todo next.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-10-13 14:06 Andrew Rambaut open
    That's what I mean.
  2. 2021-10-13 14:07 Andrew Rambaut open
    I don't know what happens if we get overruled - I guess we just have to redact them in the same way they are already redacted
  3. 2021-10-13 14:10 Edward C. Holmes open
    Ron's is the most interesting
  4. 2021-10-13 14:12 Edward C. Holmes open
    I also suspect a release would not help SAGO
  5. 2021-10-13 14:12 Kristian G. Andersen
    I suggest you both just say "no" to Jeremy - or have the lawyers say "no". He/they will then have to figure out what todo next.
  6. 2021-10-13 14:12 Edward C. Holmes open
    I said no already. Very clearly!!!
  7. 2021-10-13 14:12 Kristian G. Andersen open
    You did... Bears repeating :wink:
  8. 2021-10-13 14:13 Andrew Rambaut open
    Creating a whole lot more email to be FOI'ed
  9. 2021-10-13 14:13 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yup.

Full conversation →