Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1021 [SLACK_001235] · slack_pm:msg:10661

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I also suspect a release would not help SAGO

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
I also suspect a release would not help SAGO	needs context	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

I also suspect a release would not help SAGO

needs context

speaker_own

asserts

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-10-13 14:06 Edward C. Holmes open

I have to say no
2021-10-13 14:06 Andrew Rambaut open

That's what I mean.
2021-10-13 14:07 Andrew Rambaut open

I don't know what happens if we get overruled - I guess we just have to redact them in the same way they are already redacted
2021-10-13 14:10 Edward C. Holmes open

Ron's is the most interesting
2021-10-13 14:12 Edward C. Holmes

I also suspect a release would not help SAGO
2021-10-13 14:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

I suggest you both just say "no" to Jeremy - or have the lawyers say "no". He/they will then have to figure out what todo next.
2021-10-13 14:12 Edward C. Holmes open

I said no already. Very clearly!!!
2021-10-13 14:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

You did... Bears repeating :wink:
2021-10-13 14:13 Andrew Rambaut open

Creating a whole lot more email to be FOI'ed