Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.982 [SLACK_001196] · slack_pm:msg:10236

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Is the market location from the WHO report map too? It and the first two cases may be a little bit off...

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-07-15 07:49 Robert F. Garry open

Looks good and releasing this as raw data a good idea. A few need to be nudged, especially the lowest blue dot nearest to WIV and several of the green ones slightly. Also need to note that some dots outside of Wuhan proper are not shown.
2021-07-15 07:58 Andrew Rambaut open

I can't believe how bad those maps are - deliberately perhaps?
2021-07-15 07:58 Andrew Rambaut open

(I mean the ones in the report)
2021-07-15 08:00 Robert F. Garry open

Ours may not be perfect, but at least they are readable.
2021-07-15 08:00 Andrew Rambaut

Is the market location from the WHO report map too? It and the first two cases may be a little bit off...
2021-07-15 08:00 Andrew Rambaut open

shared file(s): image.png
2021-07-15 08:01 Andrew Rambaut open

But it is that vague greenish patch so who knows
2021-07-15 08:01 Andrew Rambaut open

WHO knows
2021-07-15 08:27 Robert F. Garry open

One problem is the Yangtze river - it's quite massive and not indicated at all in the who map. So the spots are moreor less on the bank of the river i guess. *They could also be nudged a bit though.* When I placed them i think I had the underlaying WHO map a bit more to the left, which would line things up a little better.