Private channel session 1570
17 messages over 1h 40m, 2021-07-15 – 2021-07-15.
A “conversation” here is an activity session — a run of messages with under 60 minutes of silence inside it. The channel had no native conversation boundaries.
-
@Robert Garry - would be good to fix the issue with the map. Do you have your original one that I adapted?
-
I think this is the one [shared file(s): Wuhan combined v4.ai]
-
Are you happy with the locations in that version?
-
Here is a version with each set in layers. If we can use that to get the points right, then it will be easy to build the full figure [shared file(s): map.ai]
-
I haven't got perfect alignment but here is the map overlaid on the maps from the Annex. Definitely some tweaks wecould make I think. [shared file(s): image.png]
-
Here is the Illustrator version of the above. [shared file(s): map.ai]
-
All the different panels from Fig 17 on page 156 are there. I also put in the other figure which shows which are market related.
-
Once we get this aligned, we can remake the full figure. We can also release this as our 'raw' data.
-
Looks good and releasing this as raw data a good idea. A few need to be nudged, especially the lowest blue dot nearest to WIV and several of the green ones slightly. Also need to note that some dots outside of Wuhan proper are not shown.
-
I can't believe how bad those maps are - deliberately perhaps?
-
(I mean the ones in the report)
-
Ours may not be perfect, but at least they are readable.
-
Is the market location from the WHO report map too? It and the first two cases may be a little bit off...
-
shared file(s): image.png
-
But it is that vague greenish patch so who knows
-
WHO knows
-
One problem is the Yangtze river - it's quite massive and not indicated at all in the who map. So the spots are moreor less on the bank of the river i guess. *They could also be nudged a bit though.* When I placed them i think I had the underlaying WHO map a bit more to the left, which would line things up a little better.