Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.982 [SLACK_001196] · slack_pm:msg:10233

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I can't believe how bad those maps are - deliberately perhaps?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-07-15 07:37 Andrew Rambaut open

Here is the Illustrator version of the above. [shared file(s): map.ai]
2021-07-15 07:39 Andrew Rambaut open

All the different panels from Fig 17 on page 156 are there. I also put in the other figure which shows which are market related.
2021-07-15 07:40 Andrew Rambaut open

Once we get this aligned, we can remake the full figure. We can also release this as our 'raw' data.
2021-07-15 07:49 Robert F. Garry open

Looks good and releasing this as raw data a good idea. A few need to be nudged, especially the lowest blue dot nearest to WIV and several of the green ones slightly. Also need to note that some dots outside of Wuhan proper are not shown.
2021-07-15 07:58 Andrew Rambaut

I can't believe how bad those maps are - deliberately perhaps?
2021-07-15 07:58 Andrew Rambaut open

(I mean the ones in the report)
2021-07-15 08:00 Robert F. Garry open

Ours may not be perfect, but at least they are readable.
2021-07-15 08:00 Andrew Rambaut open

Is the market location from the WHO report map too? It and the first two cases may be a little bit off...
2021-07-15 08:00 Andrew Rambaut open

shared file(s): image.png