Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.954 [SLACK_001168] · slack_pm:msg:09929

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Is this worth a response - they totally do not get that the WHO report points to multiple markets. [shared file(s): image.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-21 10:22 Kristian G. Andersen open

And Trevor chimes in with total BS... [shared file(s): Re: URGENT: Seeking your expert advice]
2021-06-21 10:35 Kristian G. Andersen open

I hope nobody responds back to this email, because I don't want to have a discussion about rooting a tree on an email chain that will be FOIAd. Trevor really should know better.
2021-06-21 10:35 Robert F. Garry

Is this worth a response - they totally do not get that the WHO report points to multiple markets. [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-06-21 10:36 Robert F. Garry open

Agree about the FOIA stuff - is there some other channel to get this info to TB - JB was told but didn't pay attention.
2021-06-21 10:37 Kristian G. Andersen open

We'll focus on getting an actual paper in place - why they think that this pandemic was caused by a single introduction into the human population, followed by perfect sampling, I don't know. Rasmus is excused for believing that, but Trevor? Plus, the issue of reversions. Andrew, you need to train your people better :wink:.
2021-06-21 10:49 Robert F. Garry open

Just to note I am on another email chain with McNutt Tony Relman and a few others following the WashPost article yesterday. Nothing ominous - but who knows what a dedicated DRASTIC look would find.
2021-06-21 10:52 Kristian G. Andersen open

Eh? What's that about?