COVID-19 Records

Slack / Private Message Drop — page 954

of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_001168

← p.953 p.955 → · this page in the original PDF · package

Andrew does it, everybody does it - when we realize the data aren't quite right / contaminants). [2021-06-20 16:59:23] [Eddie Holmes] Amazing [2021-06-20 17:01:30] [Kristian Andersen] I'm sure Tony had to make an extra call to his security service - "Be ready, folks". Anyways - we'll see. But hugely disappointing. Archiving a version of the preprint here with my highlights. [shared file(s): Bloom Preprint.pdf] [2021-06-20 17:05:18] [Eddie Holmes] Is it up yet? I'm deliberately not looking at the bioRxiv queue as I don't want to have anything to do with this is in any way. Indeed, if bioRxiv post something that includes FOIA stuff I may quit [2021-06-20 17:13:23] [Kristian Andersen] I haven't seen it in the quick queue yet. [2021-06-21 10:22:16] [Kristian Andersen] And Trevor chimes in with total BS... [shared file(s): Re: URGENT: Seeking your expert advice] [2021-06-21 10:35:29] [Kristian Andersen] I hope nobody responds back to this email, because I don't want to have a discussion about rooting a tree on an email chain that will be FOIAd. Trevor really should know better. [2021-06-21 10:35:37] [Robert Garry] Is this worth a response - they totally do not get that the WHO report points to multiple markets. [shared file(s): image.png] [2021-06-21 10:36:52] [Robert Garry] Agree about the FOIA stuff - is there some other channel to get this info to TB - JB was told but didn't pay attention. [2021-06-21 10:37:15] [Kristian Andersen] We'll focus on getting an actual paper in place - why they think that this pandemic was caused by a single introduction into the human population, followed by perfect sampling, I don't know. Rasmus is excused for believing that, but Trevor? Plus, the issue of reversions. Andrew, you need to train your people better :wink:. [2021-06-21 10:49:41] [Robert Garry] Just to note I am on another email chain with McNutt Tony Relman and a few others following the WashPost article yesterday. Nothing ominous - but who knows what a dedicated DRASTIC look would find. [2021-06-21 10:52:28] [Kristian Andersen] Eh? What's that about?

This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The Committee's PDF is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned text: /api/page/slack_pm/954

Records on this page

RecordDateTypePages
slack_pm:msg:09922 2021-06-20 chat message 953–954
slack_pm:msg:09923 2021-06-20 chat message 954
slack_pm:msg:09924 2021-06-20 chat message 954
slack_pm:msg:09925 2021-06-20 chat message 954
slack_pm:msg:09926 2021-06-20 chat message 954
slack_pm:msg:09927 2021-06-21 chat message 954
slack_pm:msg:09928 2021-06-21 chat message 954
slack_pm:msg:09929 2021-06-21 chat message 954
slack_pm:msg:09930 2021-06-21 chat message 954
slack_pm:msg:09931 2021-06-21 chat message 954
slack_pm:msg:09932 2021-06-21 chat message 954
slack_pm:msg:09933 2021-06-21 chat message 954