Slack / Private Message Drop — page 954
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_001168
← p.953 p.955 → · this page in the original PDF · package
Andrew does it, everybody does it - when we realize the data aren't quite right / contaminants).
[2021-06-20 16:59:23]
[Eddie Holmes]
Amazing
[2021-06-20 17:01:30]
[Kristian Andersen]
I'm sure Tony had to make an extra call to his security service - "Be ready, folks".
Anyways - we'll see. But hugely disappointing. Archiving a version of the preprint here with my highlights. [shared
file(s): Bloom Preprint.pdf]
[2021-06-20 17:05:18]
[Eddie Holmes]
Is it up yet? I'm deliberately not looking at the bioRxiv queue as I don't want to have anything to do with this is in any
way. Indeed, if bioRxiv post something that includes FOIA stuff I may quit
[2021-06-20 17:13:23]
[Kristian Andersen]
I haven't seen it in the quick queue yet.
[2021-06-21 10:22:16]
[Kristian Andersen]
And Trevor chimes in with total BS... [shared file(s): Re: URGENT: Seeking your expert advice]
[2021-06-21 10:35:29]
[Kristian Andersen]
I hope nobody responds back to this email, because I don't want to have a discussion about rooting a tree on an
email chain that will be FOIAd. Trevor really should know better.
[2021-06-21 10:35:37]
[Robert Garry]
Is this worth a response - they totally do not get that the WHO report points to multiple markets. [shared file(s):
image.png]
[2021-06-21 10:36:52]
[Robert Garry]
Agree about the FOIA stuff - is there some other channel to get this info to TB - JB was told but didn't pay attention.
[2021-06-21 10:37:15]
[Kristian Andersen]
We'll focus on getting an actual paper in place - why they think that this pandemic was caused by a single
introduction into the human population, followed by perfect sampling, I don't know. Rasmus is excused for believing
that, but Trevor? Plus, the issue of reversions.
Andrew, you need to train your people better :wink:.
[2021-06-21 10:49:41]
[Robert Garry]
Just to note I am on another email chain with McNutt Tony Relman and a few others following the WashPost article
yesterday. Nothing ominous - but who knows what a dedicated DRASTIC look would find.
[2021-06-21 10:52:28]
[Kristian Andersen]
Eh? What's that about?
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/954
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:09922 | 2021-06-20 | chat message | 953–954 |
| slack_pm:msg:09923 | 2021-06-20 | chat message | 954 |
| slack_pm:msg:09924 | 2021-06-20 | chat message | 954 |
| slack_pm:msg:09925 | 2021-06-20 | chat message | 954 |
| slack_pm:msg:09926 | 2021-06-20 | chat message | 954 |
| slack_pm:msg:09927 | 2021-06-21 | chat message | 954 |
| slack_pm:msg:09928 | 2021-06-21 | chat message | 954 |
| slack_pm:msg:09929 | 2021-06-21 | chat message | 954 |
| slack_pm:msg:09930 | 2021-06-21 | chat message | 954 |
| slack_pm:msg:09931 | 2021-06-21 | chat message | 954 |
| slack_pm:msg:09932 | 2021-06-21 | chat message | 954 |
| slack_pm:msg:09933 | 2021-06-21 | chat message | 954 |