A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
From the journo Eddie was talking to - "the pangolins WIV was using in CoV studies". Wait, what? Do we know about WIV working in pangolin CoVs in the lab? If so, that's huge - I haven't heard anything about that. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-06-04 at 9.42.11 AM.png]
-
He must be mistaken - maybe he taking about the original pango studies that were reported in 2019 viruses paper. And yes Eddies on some of the pango papers and I think a para flu papers where they are sick with C19-likeillnesses.
-
I think so too - and I just followed up with him about that, plus this. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-06-04 at9.48.17 AM.png]
-
If he can find evidence of pangolins at the Huanan market and link that back to e.g., that wildlife rescue center, holysmokes - I mean, that would be an actual smoking gun. A big one.
-
2021-06-04 09:49
Kristian G. Andersen
(a smoking gun for wildlife trade > rescue centers > dead animals > human food chain)
-
It's actually not crazy - a dead pangolin is no good in a wildlife rescue center, but it's HIGHLY valuable in a wet market. Bloody hell - if true, this would be so obvious.
-
Paid in the pocket virologists - David Asher.https://www.foxnews.com/world/wuhan-lab-leak-scenario-complicated-prove-credibility
-
Talking bout us...