A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
I knew that when the first subheading was titled "A Group Called DRASTIC", it was going to be bad. But this - inVanity Fair - is just outright criminal. If I was Peter, I would sue immediately. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-06-03at 8.08.08 AM.png]
-
Andrew, totally agree on your first paragraph / outline - I'll work on it tonight. We might need to create a new document...
-
@Kristian Andersen Libel: a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation.
-
@Kristian Andersen Yeah - this is that.
-
2021-06-03 08:15
Kristian G. Andersen
@Kristian Andersen Oh, just a bit.
-
As for our opening paragraph, I was playing around with the "capture-release" vs "lab leak" stuff yesterday, making some FAQs to respond to the stuff around Tony's emails. What I think is key here - and maybe we could specifically mention it - is that a "lab leak" is insufficient in itself to explain the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. A scientific theory ofSARS-CoV-2 emergence needs to be able to account for _all_ facts surrounding the origin - the "lab leak" only provides a very small part of that, not being able to explain everything prior to the leak or the fact that this got goingin a wet market. I'll see if I can incorporate a single sentence to that effect as I go through - the beauty here is that "natural emergence" explains everything.
-
And yes - to Bob's point, it must be testable... Otherwise, what are we even doing?
-
In a strange plot twist, I think I might be somewhat of a hero to Fox Nation... I also go an interview request fromNewsMax this morning - I'll decline.https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/tucker-fauci-deserves-to-be-under-criminal-investigation
-
Yeah - double agent - the most dangerous game a spy can play. [shared file(s): image.png]