Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.890 [SLACK_001104] · slack_pm:msg:09232

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I love how simple the paper is - I also love the fact that the paper was named "nCov_Lancet". I guess it never got published :slightly_smiling_face:

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-28 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-28/aussie-who-investigator-defends-wuhan-study/100175292
2021-05-28 14:37 Edward C. Holmes open

Good old Dom
2021-05-28 14:37 Kristian G. Andersen open

Poor Dom... :wink:
2021-05-28 14:38 Kristian G. Andersen open

Just came across this oldie but goodie. Do yourself a favor and read it - and then ask yourself this question "Since then, what new data have we gotten to support a lab leak?".https://img-prod.tgcom24.mediaset.it/images/2020/02/16/114720192-5eb8307f-017c-4075-a697-348628da0204.pdf
2021-05-28 14:39 Kristian G. Andersen

I love how simple the paper is - I also love the fact that the paper was named "nCov_Lancet". I guess it never got published :slightly_smiling_face:
2021-05-28 14:45 Edward C. Holmes open

Ha, spot on. Nothing whatsoever.
2021-05-28 14:48 Edward C. Holmes open

Did you write :writing_hand: the first reply to your Twitter post?:rolling_on_the_floor_laughing::rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:
2021-05-28 14:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

So good - captures everything in <100 chars :wink:
2021-05-28 15:29 Kristian G. Andersen open

I love this old bit about the SARS hunt - exactly the same question people have brought up as being suspicious about SARS2. We still don't know exactly how SARS got from Yunnan to Guangdong (but, animal trading a very likely explanation...). https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-07766-9 [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-28 at 3.27.47 PM.png]