COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.890 [SLACK_001104] · slack_pm:msg:09228

Page text: p.890 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-28 14:36
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-28/aussie-who-investigator-defends-wuhan-study/100175292

Links shared

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-28 14:03 Robert F. Garry open
    But hey - mission accomplished - they are getting a lot of time in the media. All the stuff that Amy wrote about is nota consideration.
  2. 2021-05-28 14:22 Edward C. Holmes open
    How are BioEssays able to publish this nonsense?
  3. 2021-05-28 14:29 Edward C. Holmes open
    I'm genuinely ashamed to be a scientist at the moment. We look like total dick heads. What ever happen to reason?
  4. 2021-05-28 14:36 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Reason, data, evidence, statistics - come on man, opinion is what matters!
  5. 2021-05-28 14:36 Edward C. Holmes
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-28/aussie-who-investigator-defends-wuhan-study/100175292
  6. 2021-05-28 14:37 Edward C. Holmes open
    Good old Dom
  7. 2021-05-28 14:37 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Poor Dom... :wink:
  8. 2021-05-28 14:38 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Just came across this oldie but goodie. Do yourself a favor and read it - and then ask yourself this question "Since then, what new data have we gotten to support a lab leak?".https://img-prod.tgcom24.mediaset.it/images/2020/02/16/114720192-5eb8307f-017c-4075-a697-348628da0204.pdf
  9. 2021-05-28 14:39 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I love how simple the paper is - I also love the fact that the paper was named "nCov_Lancet". I guess it never got published :slightly_smiling_face:

Full conversation →