Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.888 [SLACK_001102] · slack_pm:msg:09207

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I mean you can't prove they didn't.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-28 07:07 Kristian G. Andersen open

Predictable... https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/28/china/china-coronavirus-lab-leak-floods-mic-intl-hnk/index.html
2021-05-28 07:14 Andrew Rambaut open

Ha. I suggested on Twitter it was as likely that some one from USAMRIID infected themself and then flew to Wuhanas it was for someone from WIV to have leaked it. I will ask Beijing for a bung.
2021-05-28 07:14 Andrew Rambaut

I mean you can't prove they didn't.
2021-05-28 07:15 Andrew Rambaut open

And there are direct flights from US to Wuhan - coincidence? I don't think so.
2021-05-28 07:20 Robert F. Garry open

Another 4 or so on the shit scale: [shared file(s): How China Is Responding to the Wuhan Lab Leak Theory _ Time.pdf]
2021-05-28 07:23 Robert F. Garry open

So will USAMRIID open their books for a "forensic" evaluation? Porton Down? Winnepeg? I think not.
2021-05-28 07:28 Robert F. Garry open

It's frankly insane - USAMRIID is not going to release info all the projects that they have ongoing on emerging infectious disease vaccines and countermeasures. Same with the others. Might as well write a blueprint for terroristorgs.