COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.888 [SLACK_001102] · slack_pm:msg:09206

Page text: p.888 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-28 07:14
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut
Topics
China relations and data accessWuhan Institute of Virology collaboration

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Ha. I suggested on Twitter it was as likely that some one from USAMRIID infected themself and then flew to Wuhanas it was for someone from WIV to have leaked it. I will ask Beijing for a bung.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
I suggested on Twitter it was as likely that some one from USAMRIID infected themself and then flew to Wuhanas it was for someone from WIV to have leaked it. needs context uncertain explicit hedge asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-28 07:07 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Predictable... https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/28/china/china-coronavirus-lab-leak-floods-mic-intl-hnk/index.html
  2. 2021-05-28 07:14 Andrew Rambaut
    Ha. I suggested on Twitter it was as likely that some one from USAMRIID infected themself and then flew to Wuhanas it was for someone from WIV to have leaked it. I will ask Beijing for a bung.
  3. 2021-05-28 07:14 Andrew Rambaut open
    I mean you can't prove they didn't.
  4. 2021-05-28 07:15 Andrew Rambaut open
    And there are direct flights from US to Wuhan - coincidence? I don't think so.
  5. 2021-05-28 07:20 Robert F. Garry open
    Another 4 or so on the shit scale: [shared file(s): How China Is Responding to the Wuhan Lab Leak Theory _ Time.pdf]
  6. 2021-05-28 07:23 Robert F. Garry open
    So will USAMRIID open their books for a "forensic" evaluation? Porton Down? Winnepeg? I think not.

Full conversation →