COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.878 [SLACK_001092] · slack_pm:msg:09092

Page text: p.878 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-26 14:31
Type
chat message · slack
mentioned
Edward C. Holmes
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@Eddie Holmes :+1:

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-26 14:15 Edward C. Holmes open
    Scroll to Figure 2 of the paper for details
  2. 2021-05-26 14:16 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Just created the new channel and added Stephen, Angie, David, and Oli - Andrew, do you want to ping David/Oli? I'll also reach out to Alex to see if he's interested in helping out - his logical fallacy takedowns may be helpful for some of the later paragraphs...
  3. 2021-05-26 14:26 Robert F. Garry open
    @Eddie Holmes Very Important data. Interesting to see the paraflu viruses popping. BTW - noticed that Influenza ismisspelled in the tree figure a couple of times.....
  4. 2021-05-26 14:31 Edward C. Holmes open
    @Eddie Holmes Yes! I noticed the 'influenza' issue...they can never get their indels right.
  5. 2021-05-26 14:31 Robert F. Garry
    @Eddie Holmes :+1:
  6. 2021-05-26 14:45 Edward C. Holmes open
    Conference abstract: [shared file(s): NIDO2021_Abstract_Worthington-et-al_v2.docx]
  7. 2021-05-26 14:45 Robert F. Garry open
    Quay and Asher still making the rounds though in Republican circles - kinda like a BIzzaro World version of Batman and Robin.
  8. 2021-05-26 15:05 Robert F. Garry open
    Couple of others think their little paper has held up pretty well: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/scientists-who-doubt-wuhan-lab-theory-still-b[...]ewed-calls-to-probe-covid-origin/ar-AAKpVNJ?ocid=BingNewsSearch
  9. 2021-05-26 15:12 Andrew Rambaut open
    @Kristian Andersen Oli reckons he is supportive but doesn't know if he wants to wade in on this. But asked if hecould take a look and decide? I notice the document is currently open to anyone who has the link - perhaps weshould make it an explicit share? Just in case it leaks out.

Full conversation →