Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.877-878 [SLACK_001091] · slack_pm:msg:09091

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@Eddie Holmes Yes! I noticed the 'influenza' issue...they can never get their indels right.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-26 14:13 Andrew Rambaut open

Don't add anyone here - too much baggage
2021-05-26 14:15 Edward C. Holmes open

Scroll to Figure 2 of the paper for details
2021-05-26 14:16 Kristian G. Andersen open

Just created the new channel and added Stephen, Angie, David, and Oli - Andrew, do you want to ping David/Oli? I'll also reach out to Alex to see if he's interested in helping out - his logical fallacy takedowns may be helpful for some of the later paragraphs...
2021-05-26 14:26 Robert F. Garry open

@Eddie Holmes Very Important data. Interesting to see the paraflu viruses popping. BTW - noticed that Influenza ismisspelled in the tree figure a couple of times.....
2021-05-26 14:31 Edward C. Holmes

@Eddie Holmes Yes! I noticed the 'influenza' issue...they can never get their indels right.
2021-05-26 14:31 Robert F. Garry open

@Eddie Holmes :+1:
2021-05-26 14:45 Edward C. Holmes open

Conference abstract: [shared file(s): NIDO2021_Abstract_Worthington-et-al_v2.docx]
2021-05-26 14:45 Robert F. Garry open

Quay and Asher still making the rounds though in Republican circles - kinda like a BIzzaro World version of Batman and Robin.
2021-05-26 15:05 Robert F. Garry open

Couple of others think their little paper has held up pretty well: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/scientists-who-doubt-wuhan-lab-theory-still-b[...]ewed-calls-to-probe-covid-origin/ar-AAKpVNJ?ocid=BingNewsSearch