Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.856 [SLACK_001070] · slack_pm:msg:08903

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0022201 Interesting paper. I'll come back to it.

Links shared

journal https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0022201

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-23 05:13 Robert F. Garry

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0022201 Interesting paper. I'll come back to it.
2021-05-23 05:21 Robert F. Garry open

To DD points which is a good one, 6 of the 18 Bloomshitters (BS) were also members of the Cambridge Working Group (CWG)opposing GoF research. Notable non-overlap BS/CWG eDim and Mike Osterholm.
2021-05-23 05:23 Robert F. Garry open

The CWG lost their battle to shut down dangerous virologists largely because of this counter: http://www.scientistsforscience.org/
2021-05-23 05:28 Robert F. Garry open

This paragraph stuck our for me: "Scientists for Science have a range of opinions on how risk is best assessed. However, maintaining dogmatic positions serves no good purpose; only by engaging in open constructive debate can we learn from one another's experience. Most importantly, we are united as experts committed to ensuring public health is not compromised and the reputation of science in general, and microbiology in particular, is defended."
2021-05-23 05:33 Robert F. Garry open

List of names is good. If we could get Harald zur Hausen, Charlie Rice, Harold Varmus and Mike Bishop it would beawesome.