Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.849 [SLACK_001063] · slack_pm:msg:08824

Date: 2021-05-21 01:38
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut
Topics: Furin cleavage site and molecular features

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Here is a thought of how to structure the evidence document - Have it with categorical statements, followed by adegree of confidence in the statement (and then the evidence used in the following paragraph). I.e.:> The ACE2 binding RBD in SARS-CoV-2 was not inserted or created in a lab [Confidence: high]> ....

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
I.e.:> The ACE2 binding RBD in SARS-CoV-2 was not inserted or created in a lab [Confidence: high]> ....	own voice, substantive	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

I.e.:> The ACE2 binding RBD in SARS-CoV-2 was not inserted or created in a lab [Confidence: high]> ....

own voice, substantive

speaker_own

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-21 01:31 Edward C. Holmes open

Gilles as done some maths to show that the WIV are lying. At least he admits it: https://pihabeach.micro.blog/2021/05/04/edwardcholmes-can-be.html
2021-05-21 01:38 Andrew Rambaut

Here is a thought of how to structure the evidence document - Have it with categorical statements, followed by adegree of confidence in the statement (and then the evidence used in the following paragraph). I.e.:> The ACE2 binding RBD in SARS-CoV-2 was not inserted or created in a lab [Confidence: high]> ....
2021-05-21 01:38 Edward C. Holmes open

Excellent idea

Full conversation →