COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.849 [SLACK_001063] · slack_pm:msg:08823

Page text: p.849 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-21 01:31
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes
Topics
Wuhan Institute of Virology collaboration

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Gilles as done some maths to show that the WIV are lying. At least he admits it: https://pihabeach.micro.blog/2021/05/04/edwardcholmes-can-be.html

Links shared

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
Gilles as done some maths to show that the WIV are lying. needs context speaker_own asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-21 01:31 Edward C. Holmes
    Gilles as done some maths to show that the WIV are lying. At least he admits it: https://pihabeach.micro.blog/2021/05/04/edwardcholmes-can-be.html
  2. 2021-05-21 01:38 Andrew Rambaut open
    Here is a thought of how to structure the evidence document - Have it with categorical statements, followed by adegree of confidence in the statement (and then the evidence used in the following paragraph). I.e.:> The ACE2 binding RBD in SARS-CoV-2 was not inserted or created in a lab [Confidence: high]> ....
  3. 2021-05-21 01:38 Edward C. Holmes open
    Excellent idea

Full conversation →