Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.848 [SLACK_001062] · slack_pm:msg:08816

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Clueless

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-20 17:58 Robert F. Garry open

'Disgraced journalist' obviously could also be applied to Don McNeil as well - his "origins" piece only somewhat lessegregious. Also loved the Murdock media insight! Will the real science journalists start to re-insert their spines?
2021-05-20 18:03 Edward C. Holmes open

Forbes - who would have thought it
2021-05-20 18:40 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, surprising.
2021-05-20 19:00 Kristian G. Andersen open

Key observation about the article :wink: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-20 at 6.59.57 PM.png]
2021-05-20 19:29 Edward C. Holmes

Clueless
2021-05-20 19:48 Edward C. Holmes open

What are the odds that all of the viruses in the WIV that they have worked on over the years it's the one that's thereno record of that is subject to a catastrophic lab leak? Improbable that this virus exists on current data x improbablethat any virus leaks out = highly improbable.
2021-05-20 19:59 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup.
2021-05-20 19:59 Kristian G. Andersen open

There more you think about this particular aspect of it, the less sense it makes.
2021-05-20 20:11 Edward C. Holmes open

If they have shoddy lab procedures then surely it's the virus they use most often that has the greatest chance ofleaking out?