Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.848 [SLACK_001062] · slack_pm:msg:08813

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Forbes - who would have thought it

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-20 17:54 Edward C. Holmes open

It is!
2021-05-20 17:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

I thought it was going to be quite sketchy, but he correctly hits the main points. And yeah, Wade is a fucking disgraced journalist.
2021-05-20 17:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

Why people listen to him in 2021, I don't know.
2021-05-20 17:58 Robert F. Garry open

'Disgraced journalist' obviously could also be applied to Don McNeil as well - his "origins" piece only somewhat lessegregious. Also loved the Murdock media insight! Will the real science journalists start to re-insert their spines?
2021-05-20 18:03 Edward C. Holmes

Forbes - who would have thought it
2021-05-20 18:40 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, surprising.
2021-05-20 19:00 Kristian G. Andersen open

Key observation about the article :wink: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-20 at 6.59.57 PM.png]
2021-05-20 19:29 Edward C. Holmes open

Clueless
2021-05-20 19:48 Edward C. Holmes open

What are the odds that all of the viruses in the WIV that they have worked on over the years it's the one that's thereno record of that is subject to a catastrophic lab leak? Improbable that this virus exists on current data x improbablethat any virus leaks out = highly improbable.