Slack / Private Message Drop — page 848

https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2021/05/20/no-science-clearly-shows-that-covid-19-wasnt-leaked-fro m-a-wuhan-lab/ [2021-05-20 17:39:39] [Eddie Holmes] I enjoyed that. I particularly liked 'disgraced journalist' Wade [2021-05-20 17:44:19] [Robert Garry] :clap::clap::clap::boom: [2021-05-20 17:52:54] [Kristian Andersen] That's actually really good [2021-05-20 17:54:29] [Eddie Holmes] It is! [2021-05-20 17:55:17] [Kristian Andersen] I thought it was going to be quite sketchy, but he correctly hits the main points. And yeah, Wade is a fucking disgraced journalist. [2021-05-20 17:55:30] [Kristian Andersen] Why people listen to him in 2021, I don't know. [2021-05-20 17:58:44] [Robert Garry] 'Disgraced journalist' obviously could also be applied to Don McNeil as well - his "origins" piece only somewhat less egregious. Also loved the Murdock media insight! Will the real science journalists start to re-insert their spines? [2021-05-20 18:03:35] [Eddie Holmes] Forbes - who would have thought it [2021-05-20 18:40:03] [Kristian Andersen] Yeah, surprising. [2021-05-20 19:00:23] [Kristian Andersen] Key observation about the article :wink: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-20 at 6.59.57 PM.png] [2021-05-20 19:29:25] [Eddie Holmes] Clueless [2021-05-20 19:48:51] [Eddie Holmes] What are the odds that all of the viruses in the WIV that they have worked on over the years it's the one that's there no record of that is subject to a catastrophic lab leak? Improbable that this virus exists on current data x improbable that any virus leaks out = highly improbable. [2021-05-20 19:59:03]