Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.836 [SLACK_001050] · slack_pm:msg:08702

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Very true. I'll see what I can do.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-18 19:00 Edward C. Holmes open

No worries. Will need a lot of polishing.
2021-05-18 19:13 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah - we need to get this 100% right.
2021-05-18 19:42 Edward C. Holmes open

Chatting with someone at EgoHealth now....WIV are sending them all their sequences. Nothing close to SC2.
2021-05-18 20:08 Kristian G. Andersen open

Well, had SC2 been in there, they'd probably have taken it out... :wink:. Actually, the questions about bats and "how special is Wuhan" may be very good questions for the EgoHealth crew -I expect they might have some insights, so maybe ask? We'd have to independently validate, of course...
2021-05-18 20:13 Edward C. Holmes

Very true. I'll see what I can do.
2021-05-18 20:45 Edward C. Holmes open

When you get to Stephen's doc it's critical that we add all details/facts we can. He's gone for the big statements which is fine, but I strongly feel that we need the details.
2021-05-18 20:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup - absolutely need the details. I'll find some time tomorrow.
2021-05-18 20:53 Edward C. Holmes open

:+1: It's too vague at the moment. I added details but he chopped them.
2021-05-18 20:54 Kristian G. Andersen open

Oh, interesting... He edited text Eddie Holmes added... That's a first.