COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.836 [SLACK_001050] · slack_pm:msg:08701

Page text: p.836 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-18 20:08
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen
Topics
Intelligence community assessments

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Well, had SC2 been in there, they'd probably have taken it out... :wink:. Actually, the questions about bats and "how special is Wuhan" may be very good questions for the EgoHealth crew -I expect they might have some insights, so maybe ask? We'd have to independently validate, of course...

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
Actually, the questions about bats and "how special is Wuhan" may be very good questions for the EgoHealth crew -I expect they might have some insights, so maybe ask? quoted / not their view quoted_external sentence carries quotation marks questions

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-18 19:00 Edward C. Holmes open
    No worries. Will need a lot of polishing.
  2. 2021-05-18 19:13 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah - we need to get this 100% right.
  3. 2021-05-18 19:42 Edward C. Holmes open
    Chatting with someone at EgoHealth now....WIV are sending them all their sequences. Nothing close to SC2.
  4. 2021-05-18 20:08 Kristian G. Andersen
    Well, had SC2 been in there, they'd probably have taken it out... :wink:. Actually, the questions about bats and "how special is Wuhan" may be very good questions for the EgoHealth crew -I expect they might have some insights, so maybe ask? We'd have to independently validate, of course...
  5. 2021-05-18 20:13 Edward C. Holmes open
    Very true. I'll see what I can do.
  6. 2021-05-18 20:45 Edward C. Holmes open
    When you get to Stephen's doc it's critical that we add all details/facts we can. He's gone for the big statements which is fine, but I strongly feel that we need the details.
  7. 2021-05-18 20:51 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yup - absolutely need the details. I'll find some time tomorrow.
  8. 2021-05-18 20:53 Edward C. Holmes open
    :+1: It's too vague at the moment. I added details but he chopped them.

Full conversation →