Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.836 [SLACK_001050] · slack_pm:msg:08700

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Chatting with someone at EgoHealth now....WIV are sending them all their sequences. Nothing close to SC2.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
Chatting with someone at EgoHealth now....WIV are sending them all their sequences.	own voice, substantive	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

Chatting with someone at EgoHealth now....WIV are sending them all their sequences.

own voice, substantive

speaker_own

asserts

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-18 19:00 Edward C. Holmes open

No worries. Will need a lot of polishing.
2021-05-18 19:13 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah - we need to get this 100% right.
2021-05-18 19:42 Edward C. Holmes

Chatting with someone at EgoHealth now....WIV are sending them all their sequences. Nothing close to SC2.
2021-05-18 20:08 Kristian G. Andersen open

Well, had SC2 been in there, they'd probably have taken it out... :wink:. Actually, the questions about bats and "how special is Wuhan" may be very good questions for the EgoHealth crew -I expect they might have some insights, so maybe ask? We'd have to independently validate, of course...
2021-05-18 20:13 Edward C. Holmes open

Very true. I'll see what I can do.
2021-05-18 20:45 Edward C. Holmes open

When you get to Stephen's doc it's critical that we add all details/facts we can. He's gone for the big statements which is fine, but I strongly feel that we need the details.
2021-05-18 20:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup - absolutely need the details. I'll find some time tomorrow.