A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Now they have _Science_ throwing it's considerable cachet behind Lab Leak . And spreading the nonsense that the WHO report had no clear findings in support of natural origin - the opposite is true.
-
Interesting - shortened version of Wade's article in the NY Post. This time omitting the criticism of yours truly...https://nypost.com/2021/05/09/theory-that-covid-escaped-from-a-lab-may-not-be-far-fetched/
-
Too bad - would have "loved" to have seen @Kristian Andersen on the cover of the Post. [shared file(s): image.png, image.png, image.png, image.png]
-
It's such a reputable rag.
-
2021-05-10 14:33
Kristian G. Andersen
The Grand Wizard will likely get the honors - he's in New York too so I'm sure he'll enjoy the attention. "Sneaky Pete" will be the title.
-
I wonder what WHO will say? Ultimately, though, it's all pointless as I can't for a nanosecond see any detailed investigation of that they want ever occurring. Is there anyone more hypocritical than Ralph Baric?
-
What they're saying here: "The information, data, and samples for the study's first phase were collected and summarized by the Chinese halfof the team; the rest of the team built on this analysis."... the Chinese fiddled with the data.
-
Indeed - it's subtle. Intended to sound nefarious, but how else would the data have been collected? Nevertheless they are definitely accusing Shi et al of malfeasance not to mention killing to date over 3M people.
-
@Kristian Andersen So just Don the prick's favorite cover? Sneaky Pete rips below the belt jab? Size Matters? [shared file(s): image.png]