COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.770 [SLACK_000984] · slack_pm:msg:08067

Page text: p.770 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-10 14:26
Type
chat message · slack
mentioned
Kristian G. Andersen
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Too bad - would have "loved" to have seen @Kristian Andersen on the cover of the Post. [shared file(s): image.png, image.png, image.png, image.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-10 14:12 Edward C. Holmes open
    Exactly. Makes me puke.
  2. 2021-05-10 14:14 Robert F. Garry open
    I'm with you Eddie - very disappointing.
  3. 2021-05-10 14:18 Robert F. Garry open
    Now they have _Science_ throwing it's considerable cachet behind Lab Leak . And spreading the nonsense that the WHO report had no clear findings in support of natural origin - the opposite is true.
  4. 2021-05-10 14:18 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Interesting - shortened version of Wade's article in the NY Post. This time omitting the criticism of yours truly...https://nypost.com/2021/05/09/theory-that-covid-escaped-from-a-lab-may-not-be-far-fetched/
  5. 2021-05-10 14:26 Robert F. Garry
    Too bad - would have "loved" to have seen @Kristian Andersen on the cover of the Post. [shared file(s): image.png, image.png, image.png, image.png]
  6. 2021-05-10 14:26 Robert F. Garry open
    It's such a reputable rag.
  7. 2021-05-10 14:33 Kristian G. Andersen open
    The Grand Wizard will likely get the honors - he's in New York too so I'm sure he'll enjoy the attention. "Sneaky Pete" will be the title.
  8. 2021-05-10 14:42 Edward C. Holmes open
    I wonder what WHO will say? Ultimately, though, it's all pointless as I can't for a nanosecond see any detailed investigation of that they want ever occurring. Is there anyone more hypocritical than Ralph Baric?
  9. 2021-05-10 14:45 Kristian G. Andersen open
    What they're saying here: "The information, data, and samples for the study's first phase were collected and summarized by the Chinese halfof the team; the rest of the team built on this analysis."... the Chinese fiddled with the data.

Full conversation →