Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.768 [SLACK_000982] · slack_pm:msg:08045

Date: 2021-05-10 09:33
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Here's Jim's email - note the sly comments from Relman. Unsurprising (and not something I'll comment on - if he wants to specify exactly what's unsupported in our letter, I'm happy to address it. Usual bs). [shared file(s): lab investigation letter]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-10 09:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

According to The Seeker, nobody in their right mind would consider p(f) > 0.... :wink:
2021-05-10 09:13 Kristian G. Andersen open

Worth plotting some of this out?
2021-05-10 09:13 Andrew Rambaut open

p(h) may be close to 1 - if there is an outbreak in a farmed carnivore population.
2021-05-10 09:15 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, p(h) definitely high - p(p I h) specifically for SARS-CoV-2 also high because of the features of the virus.
2021-05-10 09:33 Kristian G. Andersen

Here's Jim's email - note the sly comments from Relman. Unsurprising (and not something I'll comment on - if he wants to specify exactly what's unsupported in our letter, I'm happy to address it. Usual bs). [shared file(s): lab investigation letter]
2021-05-10 09:52 Kristian G. Andersen open

Seems like she learned a few lessons: https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1391753059504738308?s=20 However, we then end up on this conclusion... It's just dumb. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 09.49.40.png, Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 09.51.51.png]
2021-05-10 09:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

And this fucking fake statistics about the likelihood of see CGG_CGG. It's intelligent design / irreducible complexityall over again.

Full conversation →