Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.767 [SLACK_000981] · slack_pm:msg:08029

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

No. I wouldn't have expected him to get embroiled in this (particularly after the whole Ed Hooper stuff)

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-10 08:25 Andrew Rambaut open

Baric
2021-05-10 08:25 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup, some relevant people on it - those two being the main two
2021-05-10 08:26 Kristian G. Andersen open

Have you talked to Worobey about any of this previously? There's nothing in the letter itself, but clearly it lays out afalse balance
2021-05-10 08:26 Andrew Rambaut

No. I wouldn't have expected him to get embroiled in this (particularly after the whole Ed Hooper stuff)
2021-05-10 08:28 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, I was very surprised to see him on here - and disappointed.
2021-05-10 08:30 Andrew Rambaut open

I was thinking more about the false equivalence stuff - perhaps we need a really good figure. Something not like this:
2021-05-10 08:31 Andrew Rambaut open

shared file(s): 2390701C-054C-4D1C-B9DB-1273AC4475CA_1_105_c.jpeg
2021-05-10 08:31 Robert F. Garry open

Baric - aka Deep Throat- is on because Po1 got too much press and we're not really coronavirologists.