COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.762 [SLACK_000976] · slack_pm:msg:07981

Page text: p.762 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-07 16:52
Type
chat message · slack
mentioned
Robert F. Garry
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@Robert Garry - I think it might be worth reaching out to GVN to see if they want to respond to this. I can't take the lead on something like this, but it's quite serious when a journalist as high profile as Wade (despite him being anidiot) is calling for people to "blame" virologists for the COVID-19 pandemic. It's shocking, frankly.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-07 16:49 Kristian G. Andersen open
    It's dangerous though - I mean: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-07 at 4.48.22 PM.png]
  2. 2021-05-07 16:50 Kristian G. Andersen open
    shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-07 at 4.49.59 PM.png
  3. 2021-05-07 16:50 Edward C. Holmes open
    Good points on the VOC/VOI stuff. I think the WHO proposal is simply about politics, particularly trying to avoid the association with particular places (which the press will totally ignore). The greek names is ok I guess and not afocanuba. All a bit pointless.
  4. 2021-05-07 16:50 Kristian G. Andersen open
    And, of course, this (too long for screen shot...) [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-07 at 4.50.27 PM.png]
  5. 2021-05-07 16:52 Kristian G. Andersen
    @Robert Garry - I think it might be worth reaching out to GVN to see if they want to respond to this. I can't take the lead on something like this, but it's quite serious when a journalist as high profile as Wade (despite him being anidiot) is calling for people to "blame" virologists for the COVID-19 pandemic. It's shocking, frankly.
  6. 2021-05-07 16:56 Edward C. Holmes open
    Perhaps ASM/ASV would be better. Need to avoid the response from the loose-knit community. There's so much hate in Wade's article it's hard to know where to begin.
  7. 2021-05-07 17:02 Kristian G. Andersen open
    True. Might also just be better to leave it - it's shockingly hateful. I'm wondering if I should ping Jesse to warn him about this article since his Science commentary will be mixed upwith Wade's article AND Jesse may well not read the Wade piece in detail and not realize what it actually says.
  8. 2021-05-07 17:14 Edward C. Holmes open
    No, Jesse has made his own bed - let him lie in it
  9. 2021-05-07 17:17 Edward C. Holmes open
    My advice is to do nothing: just focus on doing the best science you can Jesse is old enough to look after himself

Full conversation →