Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.757 [SLACK_000971] · slack_pm:msg:07923

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes, ignore Wade. I wonder if they've (Shi) ever even published a natural bat CoV with a FCS?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-06 20:10 Kristian G. Andersen open

Also - just found this oldie but goodie. I believe the likes of eDim and Alina have forced me into a more extreme position.... Which I'll continue to defend! :punch:https://andersenlab.slack.com/archives/GTGL6LY5C/p1591918962047400
2021-05-06 20:18 Edward C. Holmes open

I remember that well! By the way, there are no prior publications of Shi using FCSs are there? So, if this were from the lab it would their first use on the mystery virus they've told no one about.
2021-05-06 20:23 Kristian G. Andersen open

I don't think so - that's kinda what I'm trying to figure out...
2021-05-06 20:24 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm getting a TON of shit because of Wade's article, so I need to look a little closer at all of this - just for my ownsake. I'm not going to respond to Wade, but I have colleagues at UCSD telling me that _they_ have been receiving Wade's article from _their_ colleagues. Some twisted shit.
2021-05-06 20:25 Edward C. Holmes

Yes, ignore Wade. I wonder if they've (Shi) ever even published a natural bat CoV with a FCS?
2021-05-06 20:28 Kristian G. Andersen open

Probably the closest example: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26063432/
2021-05-06 20:30 Kristian G. Andersen open

No engineering in this one, but also about cleavage. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31801868/
2021-05-06 20:32 Edward C. Holmes open

I'm surprised this virus didn't emerge in Raleigh.
2021-05-06 20:35 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, me too.