COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.729 [SLACK_000943] · slack_pm:msg:07642

Page text: p.729 · original PDF

Date
2021-04-26 00:32
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

What's the feeling about B.1.617: is it genuinely increasing transmissibility or is it just riding the wave of the massive number of cases in India?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-04-26 00:32 Edward C. Holmes
    What's the feeling about B.1.617: is it genuinely increasing transmissibility or is it just riding the wave of the massive number of cases in India?
  2. 2021-04-26 00:37 Andrew Rambaut open
    B.1.617 is split into B.1.617.1 (with E484Q) and B.1.617.2 (without) and both seem to be coming up along with a lotof other stuff. But there are no sequences since the start of April and the sequencing is quite geographicallyhetrogenous. My guess is that most of it is B.1.1.7.
  3. 2021-04-26 00:38 Andrew Rambaut open
    It seems there are a lot of sequences that are not being put on GISAID: https://science.thewire.in/health/variant-first-identified-in-uk-is-behind-delhis-covid-19-surge-ncdc-chief/
  4. 2021-04-26 00:41 Edward C. Holmes open
    That's really interesting.
  5. 2021-04-26 01:40 Andrew Rambaut open
    Weirdly B.1.617.2 is coming up a lot in recent travel related international cases (with connection to India) but very little in Indian GISAID genomes so likely somewhere missing from surveillance.

Full conversation →