COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.713 [SLACK_000927] · slack_pm:msg:07483

Page text: p.713 · original PDF

Date
2021-04-18 07:59
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen
Topics
Lab-leak / accidental release hypothesisNatural origin / zoonotic spillover

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

"Daszak and Andersen are both very active on Twitter. [...] As soon as someone makes himself known who brings the laboratory theory into play, he is covered by the two with comments that are mostly somewhere between smug and disparaging." :joy:. I love to think of the Grand Wizard and myself as the Natural Origin Police. This is so dumb. If you look at eDim, however, you'll probably find that he tweets hundreds of times a day, chiming in as the Lab Leak Police - it's unbelievable how much time he waste on Twitter.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
I love to think of the Grand Wizard and myself as the Natural Origin Police. own voice, substantive speaker_own asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-04-18 07:59 Kristian G. Andersen
    "Daszak and Andersen are both very active on Twitter. [...] As soon as someone makes himself known who brings the laboratory theory into play, he is covered by the two with comments that are mostly somewhere between smug and disparaging." :joy:. I love to think of the Grand Wizard and myself as the Natural Origin Police. This is so dumb. If you look at eDim, however, you'll probably find that he tweets hundreds of times a day, chiming in as the Lab Leak Police - it's unbelievable how much time he waste on Twitter.
  2. 2021-04-18 08:00 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I love that the main diss on our paper is this: "How is it possible that Sars-CoV-2 can dock onto human cells so perfectly after such a short period of time? Is this actually as amazing as some claim, or is the phenomenon also known from other Sars viruses?". Well, wait until they see that pangolin data and I think we have an answer...
  3. 2021-04-18 08:24 Robert F. Garry open
    No one is calling for the Parisites, DRASTIC, Asher/Pottinger/Pompeo etc to provide any science, beyond *hey look* there's a coronavirus lab in Wuhan. They got nothing except that, some very selective data cherry-picking and accusations that some of the most productive virologists on the planet are liars.
  4. 2021-04-18 08:28 Robert F. Garry open
    The basis for asher's super-soldier crap here:https://jamestown.org/program/chinas-military-biotech-frontier-crispr-military-civil-fusion-and-the-new-revolution-in-military-affairs/
  5. 2021-04-18 08:35 Kristian G. Andersen open
    At least we're not Peter Daszak. Imagine having to deal with this level of (high level) bullshit? I can't imagine what his life must be like...https://republicans-energycommerce.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/EcoHealth-Alliance-Letter.pdf

Full conversation →