Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-03-31 12:18 Kristian G. Andersen open
   She's so good - I would never want to get into an argument with her. I'd be dead/
2. 2021-03-31 12:27 Robert F. Garry open
   either that or you'd be wishing that you were.
3. 2021-03-31 12:32 Edward C. Holmes open
   Pompeo's tweet is extraordinary
4. 2021-03-31 12:50 Robert F. Garry open
   Here's a report that is very pertinent to the Pompeo tweet. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/who-report-says-covid-originated-in-bats-but-critics-claim-the-study-was-biased Daszak does a very good job here IMO. Mile's Yu also inthe report was Pompeo's main point man on China - deep seated familial hatred of CCP/China. I suspect that Alina's family has similar stores to tell.
5. 2021-03-31 12:57 Kristian G. Andersen
   Relman really is an idiot - I actually thought he was a good, solid scientist. Apparently not - doesn't understand "data" and "false equivalences". I guess he isn't alone. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-31 at 12.56.43.png]
6. 2021-03-31 12:59 Robert F. Garry open
   Agreed - Another one who didn't read/understand the report.
7. 2021-03-31 13:00 Edward C. Holmes open
   The evidence is pretty well laid out in Annex D
8. 2021-03-31 13:01 Robert F. Garry open
   If you go to the end PBS actually does some real reporting - they quote 3 current White House staff to the effect that the Pompeo DoS "fact sheet" was cherry-picked out of a cacophony of noise.
9. 2021-03-31 13:02 Edward C. Holmes open
   One think we predict though was that having Daszak on has back-fired badly. What were they thinking?

Full conversation →