Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-03-31 12:04 Robert F. Garry open
   I'm thinking this is my favorite article I've ever been quoted in of all time.
2. 2021-03-31 12:14 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Haha, it's a good article - love the quotes Bob :wink:
3. 2021-03-31 12:17 Robert F. Garry open
   She did a good job - was just chatting with Angie this morning too about the info in the report of more than one market being involved in the early cases - didn't know then we were going to be quoted together.
4. 2021-03-31 12:18 Kristian G. Andersen open
   She's so good - I would never want to get into an argument with her. I'd be dead/
5. 2021-03-31 12:27 Robert F. Garry
   either that or you'd be wishing that you were.
6. 2021-03-31 12:32 Edward C. Holmes open
   Pompeo's tweet is extraordinary
7. 2021-03-31 12:50 Robert F. Garry open
   Here's a report that is very pertinent to the Pompeo tweet. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/who-report-says-covid-originated-in-bats-but-critics-claim-the-study-was-biased Daszak does a very good job here IMO. Mile's Yu also inthe report was Pompeo's main point man on China - deep seated familial hatred of CCP/China. I suspect that Alina's family has similar stores to tell.
8. 2021-03-31 12:57 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Relman really is an idiot - I actually thought he was a good, solid scientist. Apparently not - doesn't understand "data" and "false equivalences". I guess he isn't alone. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-31 at 12.56.43.png]
9. 2021-03-31 12:59 Robert F. Garry open
   Agreed - Another one who didn't read/understand the report.

Full conversation →