A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Can you believe it - he was the Director of the US CDC...
-
when you add *under Trump* it all makes perfect sense.
-
Can you believe it - he was the President of the US...
-
I wrote a little note to 60 Minutes about the upcoming Metzl interview. He's going to push the theory that SARS-CoV-2 is a product of military research at WIV.
-
2021-03-26 08:01
Kristian G. Andersen
Oh please, please, please let him do exactly that - it's going to make them look like idiots
-
Yes- my goal was to make them at least put up a bunch of disclaimers and actually label him as the idiot he is. Redfield is simply looking to be relevant for another news cycle after being a big part of the biggest public healthfuckup in history.
-
FROM 60 minBob, Thank you for your note. I assure you that neither Jamie Metzl nor anyone else in our piece alleges that the virus isthe product of a bioweapons program. You should also know that we interview Peter Daszak at length in oursegment about the animal to human pathway hypothesis that the WHO-led team has concluded is most likely. RICH
-
Rich, After listening to Shi's seminar, hearing Metzl's question to Shi and his follow-up quotes I'm still very concerned about the direction that Metzl is taking the "debate." However, it's good know that there is balance from Peter Daszak. And, I believe the WHO report actually will reset the conversation, despite the best efforts of Metzl and others todismiss the report before it appears. Best, Bob G
-
That's the best I can do.