Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.565 [SLACK_000779] · slack_pm:msg:05905

Date: 2021-03-04 11:06
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Bruno Canard is credible. I'm not sure why he goes for this. But it's a really weak list. REALLY weak. GenerallyC-listers. Interesting to see Claverie on board, although he is routinely full of shit.I spoke to Peter Daszak last week and he said he was just finishing his part of the report. My Wuhan holiday snapsare in their somewhere.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-04 11:06 Edward C. Holmes

Bruno Canard is credible. I'm not sure why he goes for this. But it's a really weak list. REALLY weak. GenerallyC-listers. Interesting to see Claverie on board, although he is routinely full of shit.I spoke to Peter Daszak last week and he said he was just finishing his part of the report. My Wuhan holiday snapsare in their somewhere.
2021-03-04 11:26 Kristian G. Andersen open

OK article from Betsy - and great quote from you Bob!
2021-03-04 11:34 Edward C. Holmes open

The Bob's Bollocks!
2021-03-04 11:37 Robert F. Garry open

Oh yes - but perhaps a bit of a missed opportunity for more Bullocks on FoxBusiness....Might have been fun but ....
2021-03-04 12:17 Edward C. Holmes open

@Kristian Andersen There's a recombination paper in the bioRxiv queue that would be good if you took a look at. Looks like garbage to me.

Full conversation →