COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.549-550 [SLACK_000763] · slack_pm:msg:05730

Page text: p.549, p.550 · original PDF

Date
2021-02-25 16:42
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

The FOI is with my institution at the moment - I have no concerns, but wanted to let them know.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-02-25 16:26 Robert F. Garry open
    I think we should get started on a peer-reviewed paper - I think strong without the additional Weifeng sequences ,but would be a simple matter to incorporate the additional sequences once released.
  2. 2021-02-25 16:42 Kristian G. Andersen
    The FOI is with my institution at the moment - I have no concerns, but wanted to let them know.
  3. 2021-02-25 16:42 Kristian G. Andersen open
    (except - we need the reviews from our Nature submission to be online too - it's important, otherwise the rejectionwill be misunderstood (or, rather, misrepresented).
  4. 2021-02-25 17:01 Edward C. Holmes open
    I agree Bob. I'm following up with the Nature thing Kristian.

Full conversation →