Slack / Private Message Drop — page 550

The FOI is with my institution at the moment - I have no concerns, but wanted to let them know. [2021-02-25 16:42:45] [Kristian Andersen] (except - we need the reviews from our Nature submission to be online too - it's important, otherwise the rejection will be misunderstood (or, rather, misrepresented). [2021-02-25 17:01:47] [Eddie Holmes] I agree Bob. I'm following up with the Nature thing Kristian. [2021-02-25 23:28:11] [Andrew Rambaut] We don't necessarily need the reviews - just the 'rejection' letter. That summarises what the reviewers said, I think? [2021-02-26 01:31:06] [Eddie Holmes] I'm on the case. [2021-02-26 04:56:02] [Robert Garry] Drawing penises on PO1 authors heads is hard, relentless and costly work. Perhaps even, Mum has threatened to push him out of her flat. Please "consider" supporting Billy aka Kevin. Paypal or Bitcoin accepted. [shared file(s): image.png] [2021-02-26 12:40:18] [Eddie Holmes] Abusive conspiracy theorist down own his luck. Heart-breaking. [2021-02-26 12:57:27] [Eddie Holmes] He should also take a lesson from that charity runner on penis drawing - his had so much more detail. [2021-02-27 07:13:47] [Robert Garry] Isn't it about more than time that Alina UNPINS her pinned Wall-of-Crazy tweetorial? So much bullshit, misinformation, innuendo and SLANDER. "I hope this analysis will help to clear things up. It will refresh us on significant early pandemic events and major publications discussing the origins of the virus (3/30)." Notably, many of the key papers describing original data on bat or pangolin coronaviruses closely related to SARS-CoV-2 share co-authors." "Soon, another preprint describing a closely related bat virus, RmYN02, and a @NatureMedicine correspondence "The proximal origins of SARS-CoV-2" were published. These both share an author with Lam et al. @Nature and both proposed that SARS2's origins are natural. (11/30)" "*Alina Chan* @Ayjchan · Oct 25, 2020 Popular request: top points. 1. Public has little idea what happened/is happening behind the scenes with journals x authors of SARS2rCoV papers. 2. The closest related virus genomes to SARS2 cannot be independently assembled due to missing data/have unexplained indiscrepancies." [2021-02-27 07:17:12] [Kristian Andersen] I think she should keep it up - perfect example of how she's deep into the conspiracy.