Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.549 [SLACK_000763] · slack_pm:msg:05729

Date: 2021-02-25 16:26
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I think we should get started on a peer-reviewed paper - I think strong without the additional Weifeng sequences ,but would be a simple matter to incorporate the additional sequences once released.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-25 16:26 Robert F. Garry

I think we should get started on a peer-reviewed paper - I think strong without the additional Weifeng sequences ,but would be a simple matter to incorporate the additional sequences once released.
2021-02-25 16:42 Kristian G. Andersen open

The FOI is with my institution at the moment - I have no concerns, but wanted to let them know.
2021-02-25 16:42 Kristian G. Andersen open

(except - we need the reviews from our Nature submission to be online too - it's important, otherwise the rejectionwill be misunderstood (or, rather, misrepresented).
2021-02-25 17:01 Edward C. Holmes open

I agree Bob. I'm following up with the Nature thing Kristian.

Full conversation →