Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.532 [SLACK_000746] · slack_pm:msg:05541

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I think bringing it all together would be really important and helpful to a lot of people - so I'm a yes on that plan.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-20 10:27 Andrew Rambaut open

@Kristian Andersen Yeah - these are not all likely hypotheses I just want to get everything on table.
2021-02-20 10:29 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup, I agree on all of that - with annual updates and us constantly chasing after the virus (which will become easier over time), we'll be fine. My concern is that most people seem to hope for this scenario on "autopilot". Basically, wehave our current vaccines, we'll get them, and it'll be a smooth cruise going forward. I'm not so sure.
2021-02-20 10:29 Andrew Rambaut open

I think I will lay some stuff out there in the B117 paper (which we need to get out quickly because Tulio is being annoying). But then I think a nice piece in Science or Nature to bring it all together?
2021-02-20 10:29 Andrew Rambaut open

Basically - a "what the fuck just happened" piece?
2021-02-20 10:30 Kristian G. Andersen

I think bringing it all together would be really important and helpful to a lot of people - so I'm a yes on that plan.
2021-02-20 10:31 Kristian G. Andersen open

Basically fleshing out a little more _many_ of the points already made in this thread. Maybe we can deploy some AIto scan through our text and write the paper for us...
2021-02-20 10:35 Andrew Rambaut open

Is that what you refer to your grad students as?
2021-02-20 10:37 Kristian G. Andersen open

"Eddie Holmes", actually - but close.