Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-02-11 13:52 Edward C. Holmes open
   Not sure if this is something or nothing. I'll need to have a chat with Dominic.
2. 2021-02-11 14:01 Andrew Rambaut open
   Need the ages. Also why don't they have a hell of a lot more in December? 80 in Oct/Nov would mean 100s in Dec.
3. 2021-02-11 14:19 Robert F. Garry open
   Agree - also agree with this: "Marion Koopmans, a Dutch virologist on the WHO team, echoed that concern. "From what we know about serology, out of 92 cases you would at least have some positives," she said." She right - if they were doing the tests right there would be some positives. What about that Italian4 year old with the supposed positive pcr - they could test his blood for antibodies. Almost inconceivable they didn't.
4. 2021-02-11 15:14 Robert F. Garry open
   https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/02/behind-the-scenes-of-donald-mcneils-new-york-times-exit
5. 2021-02-11 16:12 Edward C. Holmes
   Was he really that important for COVID or is that his self-created myth?
6. 2021-02-11 17:08 Kristian G. Andersen open
   WSJ News Exclusive - Possible Early Covid-19 Cases in China Emerge During WHO Mission! ... wait, we investigated and actually those weren't early COVID-19 cases. But fuck it, we already wrote the article,so here we go. :man-facepalming:
7. 2021-02-11 17:14 Edward C. Holmes open
   The reporting on the WHO mission has been largely shit.
8. 2021-02-11 17:27 Kristian G. Andersen open
   WaPo kinda started the shit slide - but they have been shit about it for quite sometime. Same with WSJ.
9. 2021-02-11 18:13 Robert F. Garry open
   WSJ started it when they published the Chan/Ridley BS. Expected them to take the Trump/China virus line. Yes - WashPost shit editorial opened the shit floodgates. The rest is a mish mash of AntiCCP, antiGOF anti GMO, antiscience agitators.

Full conversation →