Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.509 [SLACK_000723] · slack_pm:msg:05320

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Not sure if this is something or nothing. I'll need to have a chat with Dominic.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-11 12:40 Edward C. Holmes open

Got it now Bob. All good. I'll try to go over this later today.
2021-02-11 12:41 Robert F. Garry open

GREAT nothing cast in stone of course - just looking to consolidate the good science and correct some bad science that's out there...
2021-02-11 13:27 Kristian G. Andersen open

Bob - do you have a pdf of the WSJ article?
2021-02-11 13:35 Robert F. Garry open

here you go [shared file(s): Possible Early Covid-19 Cases in China Emerge During WHO Mission - WSJ.pdf]
2021-02-11 13:52 Edward C. Holmes

Not sure if this is something or nothing. I'll need to have a chat with Dominic.
2021-02-11 14:01 Andrew Rambaut open

Need the ages. Also why don't they have a hell of a lot more in December? 80 in Oct/Nov would mean 100s in Dec.
2021-02-11 14:19 Robert F. Garry open

Agree - also agree with this: "Marion Koopmans, a Dutch virologist on the WHO team, echoed that concern. "From what we know about serology, out of 92 cases you would at least have some positives," she said." She right - if they were doing the tests right there would be some positives. What about that Italian4 year old with the supposed positive pcr - they could test his blood for antibodies. Almost inconceivable they didn't.
2021-02-11 15:14 Robert F. Garry open

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/02/behind-the-scenes-of-donald-mcneils-new-york-times-exit
2021-02-11 16:12 Edward C. Holmes open

Was he really that important for COVID or is that his self-created myth?