A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
And, she's evil. Kristian is right - she needs to be shut down That tweet is slander. Trouble is: 1. You're a public figure. 2. She has no assets - cost you more to sue her than she is worth. Speaking from experience.
-
I will pass this on the lawyers
-
But, I agree that lawyers are not the best course of action. Makes me feel better though.
-
Well - they could do some things - cease and desist letter for example
-
2021-02-05 17:10
Robert F. Garry
Engaging her "science" is ludicrous - she is so far out of her depth it is pathetic. However, there are not that many that can grasp the difference.
-
True. I do not want to get into a long tweet debate about all this. I had planned to ignore it but that tweet crossed the line. I've now a one tweet response and that is it.
-
Well I guess the Wash Post watches Fox News.https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/02/05/coronavirus-origins-mystery-china/?arc404=true
-
Yes, I saw. They even mention DRASTIC. Will be interesting to see what WHO report.
-
Here I fixed the WasPost editorial : According to research by DRASTIC, a network of convicted pedophiles, eroticnovel writers, cryonic hucksters, slanderous post-docs turned science police, purveyors of city sized soft-corepornography and led by a penis-fixated graffiti artist, this is the most important bat coronavirus database in China.