Private channel session 927

22 messages over 2h 15m, 2021-02-05 – 2021-02-05.

A “conversation” here is an activity session — a run of messages with under 60 minutes of silence inside it. The channel had no native conversation boundaries.

1. 2021-02-05 16:26 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.487
   Wow. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-02-06 at 11.26.03 am.png]
2. 2021-02-05 16:28 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.487
   Are you fucking kidding me? Shut this shit down NOW!
3. 2021-02-05 16:28 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.487
   Should I tweet a comment on this?
4. 2021-02-05 16:32 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.487
   I just did - but this is COMPLETELY out of order - even if there's nothing to see here.
5. 2021-02-05 16:32 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.487
   It's just so idiotic - what is she hoping to achieve?
6. 2021-02-05 16:36 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.487
   I'm going to tweet as well.
7. 2021-02-05 16:38 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.487
   Done.
8. 2021-02-05 16:39 Robert F. Garry open PDF p.487
   Unfucking believable.
9. 2021-02-05 16:39 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.487
   She's just evil.
10. 2021-02-05 16:39 Robert F. Garry open PDF p.487
    She's jealous - you did an awesome job for the Frontline...
11. 2021-02-05 16:42 Robert F. Garry open PDF p.487
    And, she's evil. Kristian is right - she needs to be shut down That tweet is slander. Trouble is: 1. You're a public figure. 2. She has no assets - cost you more to sue her than she is worth. Speaking from experience.
12. 2021-02-05 16:44 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.488
    I will pass this on the lawyers
13. 2021-02-05 16:50 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.488
    But, I agree that lawyers are not the best course of action. Makes me feel better though.
14. 2021-02-05 17:07 Robert F. Garry open PDF p.488
    Well - they could do some things - cease and desist letter for example
15. 2021-02-05 17:10 Robert F. Garry open PDF p.488
    Engaging her "science" is ludicrous - she is so far out of her depth it is pathetic. However, there are not that many that can grasp the difference.
16. 2021-02-05 17:12 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.488
    True. I do not want to get into a long tweet debate about all this. I had planned to ignore it but that tweet crossed the line. I've now a one tweet response and that is it.
17. 2021-02-05 17:28 Robert F. Garry open PDF p.488
    Well I guess the Wash Post watches Fox News.https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/02/05/coronavirus-origins-mystery-china/?arc404=true
18. 2021-02-05 17:30 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.488
    Yes, I saw. They even mention DRASTIC. Will be interesting to see what WHO report.
19. 2021-02-05 17:39 Robert F. Garry open PDF p.488
    Here I fixed the WasPost editorial : According to research by DRASTIC, a network of convicted pedophiles, eroticnovel writers, cryonic hucksters, slanderous post-docs turned science police, purveyors of city sized soft-corepornography and led by a penis-fixated graffiti artist, this is the most important bat coronavirus database in China.
20. 2021-02-05 17:45 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.488
    :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:
21. 2021-02-05 18:00 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.488
    I also have on hand the relevant emails with Clare Thomas at Nature and Jeremy Farrar via Twitter message. These:100: support what I've said and show that I was trying to get the sequence released ASAP but that Zhang was under strong pressure. These are not subject to GIPA but it is good to have them.
22. 2021-02-05 18:42 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.488
    I have all the ammo, it's just a case of when I use it. I was hoping to stay above all this shit.