Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.488 [SLACK_000702] · slack_pm:msg:05087

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I will pass this on the lawyers

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-05 16:39 Robert F. Garry open

Unfucking believable.
2021-02-05 16:39 Edward C. Holmes open

She's just evil.
2021-02-05 16:39 Robert F. Garry open

She's jealous - you did an awesome job for the Frontline...
2021-02-05 16:42 Robert F. Garry open

And, she's evil. Kristian is right - she needs to be shut down That tweet is slander. Trouble is: 1. You're a public figure. 2. She has no assets - cost you more to sue her than she is worth. Speaking from experience.
2021-02-05 16:44 Edward C. Holmes

I will pass this on the lawyers
2021-02-05 16:50 Edward C. Holmes open

But, I agree that lawyers are not the best course of action. Makes me feel better though.
2021-02-05 17:07 Robert F. Garry open

Well - they could do some things - cease and desist letter for example
2021-02-05 17:10 Robert F. Garry open

Engaging her "science" is ludicrous - she is so far out of her depth it is pathetic. However, there are not that many that can grasp the difference.
2021-02-05 17:12 Edward C. Holmes open

True. I do not want to get into a long tweet debate about all this. I had planned to ignore it but that tweet crossed the line. I've now a one tweet response and that is it.