COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.456 [SLACK_000670] · slack_pm:msg:04735

Page text: p.456 · original PDF

Date
2021-01-26 17:46
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Totally agree.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-01-26 17:24 Kristian G. Andersen open
    The Moderna paper yesterday (which looks more promising) they literally took the serum at the very peak (a week after the booster) so the data would look better. In this paper they wait a few weeks and see a more worrisome effect - similar to the observations from RSA. In any case - it sounds like Moderna is already working on an updated design, so that's the right thing to do - I just hope that work gets fast-tracked.
  2. 2021-01-26 17:27 Robert F. Garry open
    @Kristian Andersen Of course, I'll send when I get back to the office computer.
  3. 2021-01-26 17:36 Edward C. Holmes open
    Indeed! Sounds like an update is needed ASAP.
  4. 2021-01-26 17:44 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I don't necessarily think it needs to get into people ASAP, but the whole process absolutely needs to be started ASAP - it's not a simple "six week and we're done" process. Better have this ready to go over the summer.
  5. 2021-01-26 17:46 Edward C. Holmes
    Totally agree.
  6. 2021-01-26 18:04 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Just looking at that CamboBat paper - very interesting. One thing they miss - that mismatch in the key RBD residue where CamboBat has "P" and the PangoCoV and SC2 have "F" (and SC1 / RmYN02 have "L") the "pre"-SARS CoVs from e.g., civets ALSO have "P". Pretty interesting. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-01-26 at 5.59.43PM.png, Screen Shot 2021-01-26 at 6.03.31 PM.png]
  7. 2021-01-26 18:09 Edward C. Holmes open
    Oh cool! It's really not much of a paper.
  8. 2021-01-26 18:14 Kristian G. Andersen open
    No, it really isn't - more of a genome announcement (although, quite a genome!)
  9. 2021-01-26 18:16 Edward C. Holmes open
    Yes, it's a beaut.

Full conversation →